Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse





Asymmetric Information and R&D Disclosure: Evidence from Scientific Publications


Baruffaldi,  Stefano Horst
MPI for Innovation and Competition, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available

Baruffaldi, S. H., Simeth, M., & Wehrheim, D. (2023). Asymmetric Information and R&D Disclosure: Evidence from Scientific Publications. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3749418.

Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000E-53B8-5
We examine how asymmetric information in financial markets affects voluntary R&D disclosure, considering scientific publications as a disclosure channel. Difference-in-differences regressions around brokerage house mergers and closures, which increase information asymmetry through reductions in analyst coverage, indicate a quick and sustained increase in scientific publications from treated firms relative to the number of publications from control firms. The treatment effects are concentrated among firms with higher information asymmetry and lower investor demand, firms with greater financial constraints, and firms with lower proprietary costs. We do not find evidence of changes in financial disclosure, nor do we find changes in patenting. Results from ordinary least squares regressions show that scientific publications by firms are positively associated with investor attention toward those firms. We complement these results with qualitative evidence from conference calls. Our results highlight the limitations and trade-offs R&D firms face in their financial market disclosure policies.