Deutsch
 
Hilfe Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT

Freigegeben

Zeitschriftenartikel

Continuous theta-burst stimulation on the left posterior inferior frontal gyrus perturbs complex syntactic processing stability in Mandarin chinese

MPG-Autoren
/persons/resource/persons23567

Zaccarella,  Emiliano       
Department Neuropsychology, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons19643

Friederici,  Angela D.       
Department Neuropsychology, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons185449

Hartwigsen,  Gesa       
Lise Meitner Research Group Cognition and Plasticity, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society;

Externe Ressourcen
Es sind keine externen Ressourcen hinterlegt
Volltexte (beschränkter Zugriff)
Für Ihren IP-Bereich sind aktuell keine Volltexte freigegeben.
Volltexte (frei zugänglich)

Wu_2024.pdf
(Verlagsversion), 2MB

Ergänzendes Material (frei zugänglich)

Wu_2024_Suppl.pdf
(Ergänzendes Material), 479KB

Zitation

Wu, J., Cheng, Y., Qu, X., Kang, T., Cai, Y., Wang, P., et al. (2024). Continuous theta-burst stimulation on the left posterior inferior frontal gyrus perturbs complex syntactic processing stability in Mandarin chinese. Neurobiology of Language, 5(2), 608-627. doi:10.1162/nol_a_00140.


Zitierlink: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000E-698E-D
Zusammenfassung
The structure of human language is inherently hierarchical.The left posterior inferior frontal gyrus (LpIFG) is proposed to be a core region for constructing syntactic hierarchies. However, it remains unclear whether LpIFG plays a causal role in syntactic processing in Mandarin Chinese and whether its contribution depends on syntactic complexity, working memory, or both. We addressed these questions by applying inhibitory continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS) over LpIFG.Thirty-two participants processed sentences containing embedded relative clauses (i.e., complex syntactic processing), syntactically simpler coordinated sentences (i.e., simple syntactic processing), and non-hierarchical word lists (i.e., word list processing) after receiving real or sham cTBS. We found that cTBS significantly increased the coefficient of variation (CV), a representative index of processing stability, in complex syntactic processing (esp., when subject relative clause was embedded) but not in the other two conditions. No significant changes in d'and reaction time (RT) were detected in these conditions. The findings suggest that (a) inhibitory effect of cTBS on the left pIFG might be prominent in perturbing the complex syntactic processing stability but subtle in altering the processing quality; (b) the causal role of the LpIFG seems to be specific for syntactic processing rather than working memory capacity, further evidencing their separability in LpIFG.Collectively, these results support the notion of the LpIFG as a core region for complex syntactic processing across languages.