Deutsch
 
Hilfe Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT

Freigegeben

Zeitschriftenartikel

Patents, Freedom to Operate, and Follow-on Innovation: Evidence from Post-Grant Opposition

MPG-Autoren
/persons/resource/persons130180

Gaessler,  Fabian
MPI for Innovation and Competition, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons130171

Harhoff,  Dietmar
MPI for Innovation and Competition, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons181321

Sorg,  Stefan
MPI for Innovation and Competition, Max Planck Society;

Volltexte (beschränkter Zugriff)
Für Ihren IP-Bereich sind aktuell keine Volltexte freigegeben.
Volltexte (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Volltexte in PuRe verfügbar
Ergänzendes Material (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Ergänzenden Materialien verfügbar
Zitation

Gaessler, F., Harhoff, D., Sorg, S., & Graevenitz, G. v. (2024). Patents, Freedom to Operate, and Follow-on Innovation: Evidence from Post-Grant Opposition. Management Science, forthcoming.


Zitierlink: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000E-75B3-4
Zusammenfassung
We study the blocking effect of patents on follow-on innovation by others. We posit that follow-on innovation requires freedom to operate (FTO), which firms typically obtain through a license from the patentee holding the original innovation. Where licensing fails, follow-on innovation is blocked unless
firms gain FTO through patent invalidation. Using large-scale data from post-grant oppositions at the European Patent Office, we find that patent invalidation increases follow-on innovation, measured in citations, by 16% on average. This effect exhibits a U-shape in the value of the original innovation.
For patents on low-value original innovations, invalidation predominantly increases low-value follow-on innovation outside the patentee’s product market. Here, transaction costs likely exceed the joint surplus of licensing, causing licensing failure. In contrast, for patents on high-value original innovations,
invalidation mainly increases high-value follow-on innovation in the patentee’s product market. We attribute this latter result to rent dissipation, which renders patentees unwilling to license out valuable technologies to (potential) competitors.