English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

The globalizability of temporal discounting

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons225915

Çetinçelik,  Melis
Language Development Department, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society;
International Max Planck Research School for Language Sciences, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons275291

Hecht,  Marlene
Center for Adaptive Rationality, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons251103

Tebbe,  Anna-Lena
Minerva Fast Track Group Milestones of Early Cognitive Development, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons98378

Wagner,  Lisa
Algorithms and Complexity, MPI for Informatics, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)

s41562-022-01392-w-1.pdf
(Any fulltext), 5MB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Ruggeri, K., Panin, A., Vdovic, M., Većkalov, B., Abdul-Salaam, N., Achterberg, J., et al. (2022). The globalizability of temporal discounting. Nature Human Behaviour, 6(10), 1386-1397. doi:10.1038/s41562-022-01392-w.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000E-A696-D
Abstract
Economic inequality is associated with preferences for smaller, immediate gains over larger, delayed ones. Such temporal discounting may feed into rising global inequality, yet it is unclear whether it is a function of choice preferences or norms, or rather the absence of sufficient resources for immediate needs. It is also not clear whether these reflect true differences in choice patterns between income groups. We tested temporal discounting and five intertemporal choice anomalies using local currencies and value standards in 61 countries (N = 13,629). Across a diverse sample, we found consistent, robust rates of choice anomalies. Lower-income groups were not significantly different, but economic inequality and broader financial circumstances were clearly correlated with population choice patterns.