Datensatz

Zusammenfassung

Prior studies suggest that visual functions undergo time-of-day variations. Under naturalistic entrainment, diurnal changes in physiology may be driven by circadian and/or homeostatic processes, and repeated measurements at different times of day are thus not suitable to draw unambiguous conclusions about circadian effects on visual function. In this study, we disentangle circadian and homeostatic effects on variations of retinal function. We examine the earliest stages of image-forming (temporal contrast sensitivity of the postreceptoral channels) and non-image forming visual functions (pupillary light response) by employing a short forced-desynchrony multiple-naps protocol lasting 40 hours. Participants (n=12, 50% female) will stay in a controlled time-isolating environment under dim light conditions and adhere to an ultra-short sleep-wake cycle, alternating between 2h30m of wake time in dim light and 1h15m hour of sleep in no light. During eleven intervals of wakefulness, participants will undergo psychophysical and pupillometric assessments with silent-substitution stimuli. We hypothesize that the sensitivity of retinal mechanisms undergoes circadian variations. This hypothesis will be investigated by separately determining psychophysical contrast thresholds to parafoveal silent-substitution stimuli targeting the post-receptoral pathways (isoluminant red-green, L-M; isoluminant blue-yellow, S; luminance, L+M+S). We will furthermore measure the pupillary light response to peripheral stimuli (annulus 10°-30°) in comparison to the response to stimuli isolating or including melanopsin stimulation. All stimuli will be delivered at constant retinal irradiance using a Maxwellian view system or artificially restricting pupil size. Additionally, we will quantify and report effects of our test stimuli on the circadian system by comparing the dim-light melatonin onset (DLMO) timing during two supplementary evening sessions, comparing dim-light conditions to such with experimental light exposure. Our work informs the fundamental biological mechanisms underlying the influence of light on the human circadian system. Based on our findings, current models about the sensitivity of the circadian system may need to be modified in order to account for the bidirectional influence of circadian function and photoreception.