English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Contribution to Collected Edition

Animals in Wartime. A legal Research Agenda

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons236852

Peters,  Anne
Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Peters, A., & de Hemptinne, J. (2022). Animals in Wartime. A legal Research Agenda. In A. Peters, J. de Hemptinne, & R. Kolb (Eds.), Animals in the International Law of Armed Conflict (pp. 3-27). Cambridge, United Kingdom; New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781009057301.002.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000F-0F89-7
Abstract
After recalling the context and purposes of the research, the chapter introduces the main challenges raised by the legal protection of animals during warfare: the silence of international humanitarian law on the issue, the difficulty in identifying which animals should be safeguarded, the inaptitude of international humanitarian law to adequately protect animals, and the ambivalent nature of the violence inflicted upon animals in wartime. The chapter then introduces the principal paradigms on which the legal protection of animals is grounded: animal species conservation regimes, animal welfare norms and animal rights. It subsequently emphasises three specific difficulties posed for animals by the current state of international law: the animal welfare gap in international law, the tension between species conservation and concern for individual animal welfare, and the fact that notably international trade and financial law has stymied animal welfare and protection efforts. The chapter then explores options to face these challenges while making best use of the legal strategies available within the existing normative framework. Potential new directions for developing international law on armed conflict are finally identified.