English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Poster

The role of disfluencies when predicting uhh language: Combining EEG and eye-tracking with virtual reality

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons223047

Huizeling,  Eleanor
Neurobiology of Language Department, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons38000

Peeters,  David
Neurobiology of Language Department, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society;
Tilburg University;

/persons/resource/persons69

Hagoort,  Peter
Neurobiology of Language Department, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society;
Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, External Organizations;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Huizeling, E., Alday, P. M., Peeters, D., & Hagoort, P. (2023). The role of disfluencies when predicting uhh language: Combining EEG and eye-tracking with virtual reality. Poster presented at the 19th NVP Winter Conference on Brain and Cognition, Egmond aan Zee, The Netherlands.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000F-16D3-A
Abstract
Language comprehension may be facilitated by prediction, where a listener’s eye-gaze moves towards a referent before it is mentioned if the noun is predictable. Anticipatory fixations reduce when speech contains disfluencies (hesitations/repairs). Changes to the pattern of anticipatory fixations could result from a change in prediction or an attention shift. We combined EEG and eye-tracking to study the prediction of language in naturalistic, virtual environments (experiment 1 & 2) and the influence of disfluencies on predicting language (experiment 2). Participants (n=32; preliminary n=19) listened to sentences spoken by a virtual agent in various virtual scenes (e.g., office, street) while participants’ eye-movements and EEG were recorded. Spoken sentences were predictable or unpredictable, based on the verb constraints and referents were visible or absent in the scene to be congruent or incongruent with listeners’ predictions, respectively. In experiment 2, sentences were additionally either fluent or disfluent with ahesitation (uhh). Increased processing, reflected in increased theta power, was greater either at the predictive verb onset or at unpredictable noun onset in fluent sentences, but was observed at both predictable and unpredictable noun onsets in disfluent sentences. Our findings provide preliminary evidence supporting that hesitations reduce the weight listeners place on their predictions.