日本語
 
Help Privacy Policy ポリシー/免責事項
  詳細検索ブラウズ

アイテム詳細


公開

Preprint

Transformative Constitutionalism in Luxembourg: How the Court Can Support Democratic Transitions

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons236751

von Bogdandy,  Armin
Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons232439

Spieker,  Luke Dimitrios
Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
フルテキスト (公開)
公開されているフルテキストはありません
付随資料 (公開)
There is no public supplementary material available
引用

von Bogdandy, A., & Spieker, L. D. (2022). Transformative Constitutionalism in Luxembourg: How the Court Can Support Democratic Transitions. Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law Research Paper Series,. doi:10.2139/ssrn.4146323.


引用: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000F-1CE2-3
要旨
Under the pressure of illiberal developments in Poland and Hungary, the Court of Justice has started to mobilize the Union’s values in Article 2 TEU. Initially, the Court focused on defending these values against specific national measures. Yet, overcoming the deeply entrenched deficiencies in these Member States will take time, effort and support. We therefore suggest taking a more forward-looking perspective, namely by framing the Court’s jurisprudence in terms of transformative constitutionalism. Such a framing provides a constructive attitude towards court-driven transformations of society. Against this backdrop, the Court can become an active ally in supporting democratic transitions in Member States that suffer from systemic deficiencies. This support can take two forms. First, the Court can insist on the essential preconditions for democratic change. In particular, it should start reviewing whether the Member States observe the essence of Charter rights, such as the freedom of expression, media and academia, and other democratic minimum standards. Second, the Court can support newly elected governments in leading their country back to the path of liberal democracy, for instance, by removing perpetrators from a packed judiciary or by breaking partisan constitutional entrenchments.