Why the neural ingredients for a language of thought are not like spatial cells 
(commentary on Kazanina & Poeppel, 2023)

van Bree, Sander

doi:10.1111/ejn.16329

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Add to Basket

Local TagsRelease HistoryDetailsSummary

Released

Journal Article

Why the neural ingredients for a language of thought are not like spatial cells (commentary on Kazanina & Poeppel, 2023)

MPS-Authors

/persons/resource/persons297606

van Bree, Sander
Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging (CCNi), School of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Glasgow, United Kingdom;
Department of Medicine, Justus Liebig University, Giessen, Germany;
Max Planck Research Group Vision and Computational Cognition, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society;

External Resource

No external resources are shared

Fulltext (restricted access)

There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.

Fulltext (public)

vanBree_2024.pdf
(Publisher version), 386KB

Supplementary Material (public)

There is no public supplementary material available

Citation

van Bree, S. (2024). Why the neural ingredients for a language of thought are not like spatial cells (commentary on Kazanina & Poeppel, 2023). European Journal of Neuroscience, 59(10), 2552-2555. doi:10.1111/ejn.16329.

Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000F-24BD-4

Abstract

There is no abstract available