English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Paper

Systematic Biases in Estimating the Properties of Black Holes Due to Inaccurate Gravitational-Wave Models

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons288167

Dhani,  Arnab
Astrophysical and Cosmological Relativity, AEI-Golm, MPI for Gravitational Physics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons281299

Völkel,  Sebastian
Astrophysical and Cosmological Relativity, AEI-Golm, MPI for Gravitational Physics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons127862

Buonanno,  Alessandra
Astrophysical and Cosmological Relativity, AEI-Golm, MPI for Gravitational Physics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons282049

Estellés Estrella,  Héctor
Astrophysical and Cosmological Relativity, AEI-Golm, MPI for Gravitational Physics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons238174

Gair,  Jonathan
Astrophysical and Cosmological Relativity, AEI-Golm, MPI for Gravitational Physics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons213835

Pfeiffer,  Harald
Astrophysical and Cosmological Relativity, AEI-Golm, MPI for Gravitational Physics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons262653

Pompili,  Lorenzo
Astrophysical and Cosmological Relativity, AEI-Golm, MPI for Gravitational Physics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons266532

Toubiana,  Alexandre
Astrophysical and Cosmological Relativity, AEI-Golm, MPI for Gravitational Physics, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)

2404.05811.pdf
(Preprint), 14MB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Dhani, A., Völkel, S., Buonanno, A., Estellés Estrella, H., Gair, J., Pfeiffer, H., et al. (in preparation). Systematic Biases in Estimating the Properties of Black Holes Due to Inaccurate Gravitational-Wave Models.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000F-2877-F
Abstract
Gravitational-wave (GW) observations of binary black-hole (BBH) coalescences
are expected to address outstanding questions in astrophysics, cosmology, and
fundamental physics. Realizing the full discovery potential of upcoming
LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA (LVK) observing runs and new ground-based facilities hinges on
accurate waveform models. Using linear-signal approximation methods and
Bayesian analysis, we start to assess our readiness for what lies ahead using
two state-of-the-art quasi-circular, spin-precessing models:
\texttt{SEOBNRv5PHM} and \texttt{IMRPhenomXPHM}. We ascertain that current
waveforms can accurately recover the distribution of masses in the LVK
astrophysical population, but not spins. We find that systematic biases
increase with detector-frame total mass, binary asymmetry, and spin-precession,
with most such binaries incurring parameter biases, extending up to redshifts
$\sim3$ in future detectors. Furthermore, we examine three ``golden'' events
characterized by large mass ratios, significant spin magnitudes, and high
precession, evaluating how systematic biases may affect their scientific
outcomes. Our findings reveal that current waveforms fail to enable the
unbiased measurement of the Hubble-Lema\^itre parameter from loud signals, even
for current detectors. Moreover, highly asymmetric systems within the lower BH
mass-gap exhibit biased measurements of the secondary-companion mass, which
impacts the physics of both neutron stars and formation channels. Similarly, we
deduce that the primary mass of massive binaries ($ > 60 M_\odot$) will also be
biased, affecting supernova physics. Future progress in analytical calculations
and numerical-relativity simulations, crucial for calibrating the models, must
target regions of the parameter space with significant biases to develop more
accurate models. Only then can precision GW astronomy fulfill the promise it
holds.