English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Preprint

Detecting and Deterring Manipulation in a Cognitive Hierarchy

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons242761

Alon,  N       
Department of Computational Neuroscience, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons241804

Schulz,  L       
Department of Computational Neuroscience, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons217460

Dayan,  P       
Department of Computational Neuroscience, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Alon, N., Schulz, L., Barnby, J., Rosenschein, J., & Dayan, P. (submitted). Detecting and Deterring Manipulation in a Cognitive Hierarchy.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000F-4280-5
Abstract
Social agents with finitely nested opponent models are vulnerable to manipulation by agents with deeper reasoning and more sophisticated opponent modelling. This imbalance, rooted in logic and the theory of recursive modelling frameworks, cannot be solved directly. We propose a computational framework, ℵ-IPOMDP, augmenting model-based RL agents' Bayesian inference with an anomaly detection algorithm and an out-of-belief policy. Our mechanism allows agents to realize they are being deceived, even if they cannot understand how, and to deter opponents via a credible threat. We test this framework in both a mixed-motive and zero-sum game. Our results show the ℵ mechanism's effectiveness, leading to more equitable outcomes and less exploitation by more sophisticated agents. We discuss implications for AI safety, cybersecurity, cognitive science, and psychiatry.