English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Preprint

The Local Politics of Social Investment under Fiscal Constraints: The Case of Childcare Expansion in Germany

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons232927

Neimanns,  Erik       
Politische Ökonomie, MPI for the Study of Societies, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons242464

Bremer,  Björn       
Politische Ökonomie, MPI for the Study of Societies, Max Planck Society;
Central European University, Vienna, Austria;

External Resource
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Neimanns, E., & Bremer, B. (2024). The Local Politics of Social Investment under Fiscal Constraints: The Case of Childcare Expansion in Germany. SocArXiv. doi:10.31235/osf.io/9yrp2.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000F-4BA2-6
Abstract
Embedded in a broader discourse on future-oriented social policy and the idea of a social investment welfare state, governments in many of the advanced economies expanded childcare in recent years. Yet, in many countries considerable regional variation exists in coverage rates and expansion efforts, and often the supply of childcare still does not match demand. In this paper, we explore the politics of this regional variation by studying Germany, a country which had relatively low rates of childcare coverage for a long time, but recently introduced a legal entitlement to childcare. Despite this legal entitlement, we argue that local political and economic factors (continue to) matter for childcare expansion. We expect left-wing local political majorities to be associated with stronger expansion dynamics. At the same time, tight local fiscal constraints, which are widespread in Germany’s fiscal federalism, should limit partisan room for maneuver and party effects, and should slow down expansion. Analyzing local-level data on childcare coverage rates, socio-economic context factors and government partisanship, we find empirical support for our expectations. Building on these findings, we furthermore examine how local governments reconcile gaps in childcare provision with the legal entitlement to childcare and what distributive consequences this has.