English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Comparison of Serum ß2-Microglobulin and Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA) in the Follow-Up of Breast Cancer Patients

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons285242

Staab,  H-J
Anderer Group, Friedrich Miescher Laboratory, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons282624

Anderer,  FA
Anderer Group, Friedrich Miescher Laboratory, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Staab, H.-J., Ahlemann, L., Anderer, F., Hiesche, K., & Rodatz, W. (1981). Comparison of Serum ß2-Microglobulin and Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA) in the Follow-Up of Breast Cancer Patients. Journal of Clinical Chemistry and Clinical Biochemistry, 19(6), 339-345. doi:10.1515/cclm.1981.19.6.339.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000F-50E2-7
Abstract
Using commercially available radioimmune test kits, serial determinations of serum beta 2-microglobulin and CEA were performed in 337 patients, who had been treated for breast cancer by modified radical mastectomy and radiotherapy. The pre-therapeutic data indicated a higher incidence of pathological beta 2-microglobulin and CEA levels in patients with distant metastases than in patients with localized disease. However, this finding did not allow the conclusion of a direct complementarity of beta 2-microglobulin and CEA as tumour markers, since the group of patients with distant metastasis contained a high percentage of elderly patients who generally can be expected to have elevated beta 2-microglobulin serum concentrations. Therefore, the correlation of the clinical course of malignant disease and the incidence of relapses with the changes of serum beta 2-microglobulin and CEA concentrations was examined during the post-treatment surveillance: 7/9 cases (78%) with local recurrence and 46/73 cases (63%) with distant spread of disease were not indicated in the beta 2-microglobulin follow-up by pathologic serum concentrations, whereas in the CEA follow-up only 1/9 and 2/73 false negative indications were registered. The poor correlation suggests that serum beta 2-microglobulin is not directly tumour associated in breast cancer and does not fulfill the criteria of a tumour marker.