Deutsch
 
Hilfe Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT

Freigegeben

Preprint

Visually Evoked 40 Hz Gamma Activity Enhanced by Transcranial Electrical Stimulation

MPG-Autoren
/persons/resource/persons268323

Spitschan,  M       
Research Group Translational Sensory and Circadian Neuroscience, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

Volltexte (beschränkter Zugriff)
Für Ihren IP-Bereich sind aktuell keine Volltexte freigegeben.
Volltexte (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Volltexte in PuRe verfügbar
Ergänzendes Material (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Ergänzenden Materialien verfügbar
Zitation

Hainke, L., Spitschan, M., Priller, J., Taylor, P., & Dowsett, J. (submitted). Visually Evoked 40 Hz Gamma Activity Enhanced by Transcranial Electrical Stimulation.


Zitierlink: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000F-7691-8
Zusammenfassung
Background: Non-invasive Visual Stimulation (VS) and Transcranial Electrical Stimulation (TES) can modulate neuronal oscillations, including gamma activity at 40 Hz, which is relevant for cognition and disrupted in dementia. Combining both techniques may increase effects, but simultaneously recording Electroencephalography (EEG) activity poses several challenges, so this approach is untested. Objectives: We predicted that combined TES and VS in the lower gamma band would increase Steady-State Visually Evoked Potential (SSVEP) amplitude during and after stimulation, but only when targeting visual areas and at closely matching stimulation frequencies. Methods: We administered combined VS and TES and simultaneously measured effects on EEG gamma activity in healthy participants. In experiment 1 (N=25), VS and TES frequencies were closely matched at ~40 Hz, and TES sites varied between occipito-central, centro-occipital (reversed polarity), and centro-frontal. In experiment 2 (N=25), occipito-central TES was applied at ~40 Hz, and VS frequency varied between 35, 40, and 45 Hz. Every 5-minute VS+TES trial was preceded and followed by a VS-only baseline trial. Electrical artifacts were removed using adaptive template subtraction. Results: TES enhanced gamma SSVEP amplitudes most when applied to occipital and central sites, compared to frontal. Enhancement only occurred when TES and VS frequencies closely matched at ~40 Hz, not when VS was slower (35 Hz) or faster (45 Hz) than TES. The effect was present during, not after, TES. Conclusion: Multimodal visual and electrical stimulation evokes stronger oscillatory gamma activity than visual alone. Non-invasive gamma stimulation against cognitive decline in dementia may benefit from this optimised approach.