English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

A Tale of Two Distrusts: Memory Distrust Toward Commission and Omission Errors in the Chinese Context

MPS-Authors
There are no MPG-Authors in the publication available
External Resource
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Zhang, Y., Qi, F., Otgaar, H., Nash, R., & Jelicic, M. (2023). A Tale of Two Distrusts: Memory Distrust Toward Commission and Omission Errors in the Chinese Context. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. doi:10.1037/mac0000134.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000F-81D9-A
Abstract
People differ in their skepticism toward their own memories, which is called memory distrust and is measured by the Squire Subjective Memory Questionnaire (SSMQ) and the Memory Distrust Scale (MDS). In Study 1 (N = 458), we translated the MDS into Chinese and found that MDS scores were correlated with self-reported memory errors, compliance, and life habits impacting source monitoring and had acceptable test–retest reliability after 4 weeks. In Study 2, participants (N = 383) completed a recognition task and received false feedback, then they completed the recognition task again, and completed the MDS and SSMQ 3 days later. High (vs. low) memory distrust people were more likely to accept the false feedback and change their memory afterward. The present research confirms the validity of the Chinese MDS, advancing the theoretical understanding of the interplay between metamemorial beliefs and social influence on memory reconstruction.