English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Multiple talker processing in autistic adult listeners

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons30

Cutler,  Anne
Emeriti, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society;
MARCS Institute for Brain, Behaviour and Development, Western Sydney University;
ARC Centre of Excellence for the Dynamics of Language;

External Resource

Data availability
(Supplementary material)

Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)

s41598-024-62429-w.pdf
(Publisher version), 2MB

Supplementary Material (public)

41598_2024_62429_MOESM1_ESM.docx
(Supplementary material), 13KB

Citation

Alispahic, S., Pellicano, E., Cutler, A., & Antoniou, M. (2024). Multiple talker processing in autistic adult listeners. Scientific Reports, 14: 14698. doi:10.1038/s41598-024-62429-w.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000F-999E-3
Abstract
Accommodating talker variability is a complex and multi-layered cognitive process. It involves shifting attention to the vocal characteristics of the talker as well as the linguistic content of their speech. Due to an interdependence between voice and phonological processing, multi-talker
environments typically incur additional processing costs compared to single-talker environments. A failure or inability to efficiently distribute attention over multiple acoustic cues in the speech signal
may have detrimental language learning consequences. Yet, no studies have examined effects of multi-talker processing in populations with atypical perceptual, social and language processing for communication, including autistic people. Employing a classic word-monitoring task, we investigated
effects of talker variability in Australian English autistic (n = 24) and non-autistic (n = 28) adults.
Listeners responded to target words (e.g., apple, duck, corn) in randomised sequences of words. Half of the sequences were spoken by a single talker and the other half by multiple talkers. Results revealed that autistic participants’ sensitivity scores to accurately-spotted target words did not differ to those
of non-autistic participants, regardless of whether they were spoken by a single or multiple talkers. As expected, the non-autistic group showed the well-established processing cost associated with talker
variability (e.g., slower response times). Remarkably, autistic listeners’ response times did not differ across single- or multi-talker conditions, indicating they did not show perceptual processing costs
when accommodating talker variability. The present findings have implications for theories of autistic perception and speech and language processing.