English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Contribution to Collected Edition

Conclusion: Half-hearted Multilaterisation of a Unilateral Doctrine

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons236836

Marxsen,  Christian
Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Marxsen, C. (2023). Conclusion: Half-hearted Multilaterisation of a Unilateral Doctrine. In D. Kritsiotis, O. Corten, & G. H. Fox (Eds.), Armed Intervention and Consent (pp. 319-330). Cambridge, UK; New York, NY; Port Melbourne; New Delhi; Singapore: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781009370073.006.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000F-A379-1
Abstract
This concluding chapter draws the central threads of the book together. It proceeds in five steps, providing conclusions, first, on the limitation of military intervention by invitation and, second, on the institutionalisation triggered by the increased importance of the UN Security Council in the operation of the law. It then takes up the question of whether Council practice may contribute to the development of the law, and it addresses the politicisation of the practice of consensual military intervention. Finally, it argues that while practice has been multilateralised as a result of the increased role the Security Council plays, we are in fact witness only to a ‘half-hearted multilateralisation’.