English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Contribution to Handbook

Constitutional Adjudication in the European Legal Space

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons236751

von Bogdandy,  Armin       
Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

von Bogdandy, A., Grabenwarter, C., & Huber, P. M. (2023). Constitutional Adjudication in the European Legal Space. In A. von Bogdandy, P. M. Huber, C. Grabenwarter, & L. Hering (Eds.), The Max Planck Handbooks in European Public Law. Volume 4: Constitutional Adjudication: Common themes and challenges (First edition, pp. 651-670). Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oso/9780192846693.003.0017.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000F-B213-2
Abstract
This chapter highlights the characteristics, challenges, and perspectives of constitutional adjudication in Europe. It is the concluding chapter to the two respective volumes of the Max Planck Handbooks. Though there are many different institutionalizations and trajectories, all the relevant courts increasingly share features for their involvement in and their responsibility for the European legal space. The positive foundation of this common responsibility are the values established in Article 2 TEU. This responsibility is, however, being subjected to a severe test today; indeed the main challenge these courts face today is authoritarianism. To combat this rise of authoritarianism, this chapter argues, they must form a more perfect union.