English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Putting situational affordances in an intervention context: How the interaction between personality and intervention situations can help us explain differential intervention responses

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons269024

Thielmann,  Isabel
Independent Research Group: Personality, Identity, and Crime, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Crime, Security and Law, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons278295

Siezenga,  Aniek
Criminology, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Crime, Security and Law, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons239621

Van Gelder,  Jean-Louis
Criminology, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Crime, Security and Law, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)

journal.pone.0309180.pdf
(Any fulltext), 2MB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Mertens, E., Thielmann, I., Nocentini, A., Siezenga, A., & Van Gelder, J.-L. (2024). Putting situational affordances in an intervention context: How the interaction between personality and intervention situations can help us explain differential intervention responses. PLOS ONE, 19(12): e0309180. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0309180.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000F-D1FD-8
Abstract
We propose a framework in which interventions are described as situations affording the expression of certain personality traits to provide a systematic understanding of differential intervention response by personality traits. The goal of the present paper is twofold: 1) elaborate on the proposed framework, and 2) provide an initial test of this framework. We empirically tested this framework using data from a Randomized Controlled Trial (N = 176) that examined a smartphone-based intervention aimed at increasing future-oriented thinking and behavior, and assessed HEXACO personality traits. The results showed that more introverted and agreeable individuals profited most from the intervention. Although these results were not in line with our a priori predictions, they could be explained using the proposed situational affordances framework. This shows the potential of this framework in an intervention context, though more research and tests using different interventions are needed.