English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Cortical and behavioral tracking of rhythm in music: Effects of pitch predictability, enjoyment, and expertise

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons200142

Mencke,  Iris       
Department of Music, Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, Max Planck Society;
Department of Medical Physics and Acoustics, University of Oldenburg;

/persons/resource/persons185675

Rimmele,  Johanna Maria       
Department of Cognitive Neuropsychology, Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, Max Planck Society;
Max Planck NYU Center for Language, Music, and Emotion;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)

mus-25-men-01-cortical.pdf
(Publisher version), 2MB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Keitel, A., Pelofi, C., Guan, X., Watson, E., Wight, L., Allen, S., et al. (2024). Cortical and behavioral tracking of rhythm in music: Effects of pitch predictability, enjoyment, and expertise. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1546(1), 120-135. doi:10.1111/nyas.15315.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0010-F095-6
Abstract
The cortical tracking of stimulus features is a crucial neural requisite of how we process continuous music. We here tested whether cortical tracking of the beat, typically related to rhythm processing, is modulated by pitch predictability and other top-down factors. Participants listened to tonal (high pitch predictability) and atonal (low pitch predictability) music while undergoing electroencephalography. We analyzed their cortical tracking of the acoustic envelope. Cortical envelope tracking was stronger while listening to atonal music, potentially reflecting listeners’ violated pitch expectations and increased attention allocation. Envelope tracking was also stronger with more expertise and enjoyment. Furthermore, we showed cortical tracking of pitch surprisal (using IDyOM), which suggests that listeners’ expectations match those computed by the IDyOM model, with higher surprisal for atonal music. Behaviorally, we measured participants’ ability to finger-tap to the beat of tonal and atonal sequences in two experiments. Finger-tapping performance was better in the tonal condition, indicating a positive effect of pitch predictability on behavioral rhythm processing. Cortical envelope tracking predicted tapping performance for tonal music, as did pitch-surprisal tracking for atonal music, indicating that high and low predictability might impose different processing regimes. Taken together, our results show various ways that top-down factors impact musical rhythm processing.