English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Endogenous auditory and motor brain rhythms predict individual speech tracking

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons255419

Lubinus,  Christina       
Department of Cognitive Neuropsychology, Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons185675

Rimmele,  Johanna Maria       
Department of Cognitive Neuropsychology, Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Lubinus, C., Keitel, A., Obleser, J., Poeppel, D., & Rimmele, J. M. (2025). Endogenous auditory and motor brain rhythms predict individual speech tracking. bioRxiv. doi:10.1101/2025.03.24.644939.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0010-F3FD-F
Abstract
Slow, endogenous brain rhythms in auditory cortex are hypothesized to track acoustic amplitude modulations during speech comprehension. Temporal predictions from the motor system are thought to enhance this tracking. However, direct evidence for the involvement of endogenous auditory and motor brain rhythms is lacking. Combining magnetoencephalographic recordings with behavioral data, we here show that endogenous peak frequencies of individuals’ resting-state theta rhythm in superior temporal gyrus predict speech tracking during comprehension. Importantly, endogenous rates of speech motor areas predicted auditory-cortical speech tracking only in individuals with high auditory–motor synchronization profiles. Higher rates in the supplementary motor area, and lower rates in inferior frontal gyrus, predicted stronger tracking. These findings align with participants’ behavioral data and provide compelling support for oscillatory accounts of auditory–motor interactions during speech perception. Interestingly, working memory capacity predicted speech comprehension performance particularly in individuals with low auditory–motor synchronization profiles. The findings highlight two partially independent speech processing routes across individuals: an auditory–motor route, related to enhanced comprehension performance, and an auditory working-memory route.