Item

Abstract

Modeling heat transport by convection is one of the most challenging aspects of solar and stellar physics. The literature currently provides apparently inconsistent observational estimates of the strength of large-scale convective flows in the upper layers of the solar convection zone. In addition, the large-scale convective flows predicted from numerical simulations are substantially stronger than some of the observational inferences in the literature. The current work aims to provide a consistent presentation of some of the main results in the literature both from observations and simulations. To achieve this aim, we carry out an analysis of published estimates of the strength of solar convection at different spatial scales. In particular, we employ a consistent set of conventions to compute the kinetic energy density in the east-west flows. This establishes a clear baseline for future work. The main conclusion is that there are inconsistencies between different observational results and also differences between observations and simulations. This conclusion is important as it demonstrates a need to determine the sources of the inconsistencies between different observational inferences and also to determine the missing ingredients in simulations of solar subsurface convection.