English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Strangers in the dark: An investigation of assumed similarity in judgements of unknown others on aversive personality

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons269024

Thielmann,  Isabel
Independent Research Group: Personality, Identity, and Crime, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Crime, Security and Law, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Tan, N.-P.-J., Hilbig, B., Moshagen, M., Zettler, I., Payer, S., & Thielmann, I. (2025). Strangers in the dark: An investigation of assumed similarity in judgements of unknown others on aversive personality. Judgment and Decision Making, (20): e38. doi:10.1017/jdm.2025.10013.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0011-B33C-0
Abstract
The need to maintain cooperation in social dilemmas is a fundamental challenge. Responses to social dilemmas are affected by dispositions toward exploitativeness (i.e., the maximization of one’s own utility) and distrust (i.e., the fear of being exploited by others). This is because the belief that others are untrustworthy justifies exploitative behaviors. The Dark Factor of Personality (D) is postulated to comprise the conjunction of these dispositions, implying that individuals will assume similarity on D. In this research, we sought to test this implication by examining whether individuals’ self- and observer reports of unacquainted targets on D converge. Across five studies, we found that individuals assume similarity on D when unknown targets are described as ‘typical’ (Study 1) or when shown a photograph (Studies 2–5). These effects were not moderated by the congruency between rater and target sex (Studies 2 and 3); however, we found that higher attractiveness of targets led to greater assumed similarity on D (Studies 4 and 5). These findings are consistent with D reflecting the conjunction of exploitativeness and distrust while also suggesting that assumed similarity on D is moderated by the interpersonal attraction of those being rated.