English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Conference Paper

Intonational marking of focus in different word orders in German children

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons24

Chen,  Aoju
Language Acquisition Department, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society;
Radboud University Nijmegen;

/persons/resource/persons2697

Järvikivi,  Juhani
Language Acquisition Department, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society;
Radboud University Nijmegen;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)

Sauermann_Intonational_Marking_2011.pdf
(Publisher version), 291KB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Sauermann, A., Höhle, B., Chen, A., & Järvikivi, J. (2011). Intonational marking of focus in different word orders in German children. In M. B. Washburn, K. McKinney-Bock, E. Varis, & A. Sawyer (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (pp. 313-322). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0012-C820-0
Abstract
The use of word order and intonation to mark focus in child speech has received some attention. However, past work usually examined each device separately or only compared the realizations of focused vs. non-focused constituents. This paper investigates the interaction between word order and intonation in the marking of different focus types in 4- to 5-year old German-speaking children and an adult control group. An answer-reconstruction task was used to elicit syntactic (word order) and intonational focus marking of subject and objects (locus of focus) in three focus types (broad, narrow, and contrastive focus). The results indicate that both children and adults used intonation to distinguish broad from contrastive focus but they differed in the marking of narrow focus. Further, both groups preferred intonation to word order as device for focus marking. But children showed an early sensitivity for the impact of focus type and focus location on word order variation and on phonetic means to mark focus.