Genetic biasing through cultural transmission: Do simple Bayesian models of 
language evolution generalize?

Dediu, Dan

doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2009.04.004

アイテム詳細

登録内容を編集ファイル形式で保存

一時保存へ追加

タグ情報を表示リリース履歴を表示詳細要約

公開

学術論文

Genetic biasing through cultural transmission: Do simple Bayesian models of language evolution generalize?

MPS-Authors

/persons/resource/persons34

Dediu, Dan
Neurobiology of Language Group, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society;

External Resource

There are no locators available

Fulltext (restricted access)

There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.

フルテキスト (公開)

Dediu_2009_genetic.pdf
(出版社版), 345KB

付随資料 (公開)

There is no public supplementary material available

引用

Dediu, D. (2009). Genetic biasing through cultural transmission: Do simple Bayesian models of language evolution generalize? Journal of Theoretical Biology, 259, 552-561. doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2009.04.004.

引用: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0013-230F-6

要旨

The recent Bayesian approaches to language evolution and change seem to suggest that genetic biases can impact on the characteristics of language, but, at the same time, that its cultural transmission can partially free it from these same genetic constraints. One of the current debates centres on the striking diﬀerences between sampling and a posteriori maximising Bayesian learners, with the ﬁrst converging on the prior bias while the latter allows a certain freedom to language evolution. The present paper shows that this diﬀerence disappears if populations more complex than a single teacher and a single learner are considered, with the resulting behaviours more similar to the sampler. This suggests that generalisations based on the language produced by Bayesian agents in such homogeneous single agent chains are not warranted. It is not clear which of the assumptions in such models are responsible, but these ﬁndings seem to support the rising concerns on the validity of the “acquisitionist” assumption, whereby the locus of language change and evolution is taken to be the ﬁrst language acquirers (children) as opposed to the competent language users (the adults).