How do we account for the absence of "change deafnes"?

Isel, Frédéric

doi:10.1017/S0140525X01390118

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Add to Basket

Local TagsRelease HistoryDetailsSummary

Released

Journal Article

How do we account for the absence of "change deafnes"?

MPS-Authors

/persons/resource/persons19746

Isel, Frédéric
MPI of Cognitive Neuroscience (Leipzig, -2003), The Prior Institutes, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society;

External Resource

No external resources are shared

Fulltext (restricted access)

There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.

Fulltext (public)

There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe

Supplementary Material (public)

There is no public supplementary material available

Citation

Isel, F. (2001). How do we account for the absence of "change deafnes"? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(5), 988-988. doi:10.1017/S0140525X01390118.

Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0010-BA2E-7

Abstract

O'Regan & Noë (O&N) argue that there is no need of internal, more or less picture-like, representation of the visual world in the brain. They propose a new approach in which vision is a mode of exploration of the world that is mediated by knowledge of sensorimotor contingencies. Data obtained in “change blindness” experiments support this assumption.