English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Impedance control and its relation to precision in orofacial movement

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons19808

Laboissière,  Rafael
Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Espace et Action, Paris, France;
Université Claude Bernard, Lyon 1, Institut Fédératif de Recherche des Neurosciences de Lyon, Institut Fédératif de Recherche sur le Handicap, Unité Mixte de Recherche, Bron, France;
Research Group Sensorimotor Coordination, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society;

Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Laboissière, R., Lametti, D. R., & Ostry, D. J. (2009). Impedance control and its relation to precision in orofacial movement. Journal of Neurophysiology, 102(1), 523-531. doi:10.1152/jn.90948.2008.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0010-BBDB-A
Abstract
Speech production involves some of the most precise and finely timed patterns of human movement. Here, in the context of jaw movement in speech, we show that spatial precision in speech production is systematically associated with the regulation of impedance and in particular, with jaw stiffness - a measure of resistance to displacement. We estimated stiffness and also variability during movement using a robotic device to apply brief force pulses to the jaw. Estimates of stiffness were obtained using the perturbed position and force trajectory and an estimate of what the trajectory would be in the absence of load. We estimated this "reference trajectory" using a new technique based on Fourier analysis. A moving-average (MA) procedure was used to estimate stiffness by modeling restoring force as the moving average of previous jaw displacements. The stiffness matrix was obtained from the steady state of the MA model. We applied this technique to data from 31 subjects whose jaw movements were perturbed during speech utterances and kinematically matched nonspeech movements. We observed systematic differences in stiffness over the course of jaw-lowering and jaw-raising movements that were correlated with measures of kinematic variability. Jaw stiffness was high and variability was low early and late in the movement when the jaw was elevated. Stiffness was low and variability was high in the middle of movement when the jaw was lowered. Similar patterns were observed for speech and nonspeech conditions. The systematic relationship between stiffness and variability points to the idea that stiffness regulation is integral to the control of orofacial movement variability. Copyright © 2009 The American Physiological Society.