Deutsch
 
Hilfe Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT

Freigegeben

Poster

The influence of another's actions on one's own synchronization with music

MPG-Autoren
/persons/resource/persons19898

Nowicki,  Lena
Max Planck Research Group Music Cognition and Action, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society;
Department Psychology, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons19767

Keller,  Peter E.
Department Psychology, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons19932

Prinz,  Wolfgang
Department Psychology, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society;

Externe Ressourcen
Es sind keine externen Ressourcen hinterlegt
Volltexte (beschränkter Zugriff)
Für Ihren IP-Bereich sind aktuell keine Volltexte freigegeben.
Volltexte (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Volltexte in PuRe verfügbar
Ergänzendes Material (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Ergänzenden Materialien verfügbar
Zitation

Nowicki, L., Keller, P. E., & Prinz, W. (2007). The influence of another's actions on one's own synchronization with music. Poster presented at 15th Meeting of the European Society for Cognitive Psychology (ESCoP), Marseille, France.


Zitierlink: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0010-E137-1
Zusammenfassung
How is one’s own music performance affected by the presence of a co-performer? The present study provides a first step into the investigation of this question. Pairs of musically trained participants were asked to tap the beat of two types of auditory sequences (a musical piece and a metronome), either on their own (solo) or alternating with another participant (joint). Tapping either produced no audible effects (Experiment 1) or percussive sounds (Experiments 2). Results showed higher synchronization accuracy and lower timing variability when tapping produced auditory effects, which may be because temporal information is processed more rapidly when auditory feedback is given in addition to tactile feedback. This feedback benefit was stronger for metronomic than for musical sequences. Further, variability was higher in joint than in solo conditions. Correlation analyses revealed interdependencies between participants’ tapping, suggesting that mutual error correction may have inflated variability in joint conditions.