English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

The local adsorption geometry of CO and NH3 on NiO (100) determined by scanned-energy mode photoelectron diffraction

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons21727

Kittel,  Martin
Chemical Physics, Fritz Haber Institute, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons21633

Hoeft,  Jon T.
Chemical Physics, Fritz Haber Institute, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons21328

Bao,  Shining
Molecular Physics, Fritz Haber Institute, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons21969

Polcik,  Martin
Chemical Physics, Fritz Haber Institute, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons22255

Woodruff,  David Phillip
Chemical Physics, Fritz Haber Institute, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Kittel, M., Hoeft, J. T., Bao, S., Polcik, M., Toomes, R. L., Kang, J. H., et al. (2002). The local adsorption geometry of CO and NH3 on NiO (100) determined by scanned-energy mode photoelectron diffraction. Surface Science, 499(1), 1-14. doi:10.1016/S0039-6028(01)01957-4.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0011-15DF-A
Abstract
The local adsorption structures of CO and NH3 on NiO(I 0 D) have,been determined by C Is and N 1s scanned-energy mode photoelectron diffraction. CO adsorbs atop Ni surface atoms through the C atom in an essentially perpendicular geometry (tilt angle 12 +/- 12degrees) with a C-Ni nearest-neighbour distance of 2.07 +/- 0.02 Angstrom. NH3 also adsorbs atop Ni surface atoms with a N-Ni distance of 2.06 +/- 0.02 Angstrom. These bondlengths are only very slightly longer than the comparable values for adsorption on metallic Ni surfaces. By contrast theoretical values obtained from total energy calculations, which exist for CO adsorption on NiO(I 00) (2.46 Angstrom and 2.86 Angstrom) are very much longer than the experimental value. Similar discrepancies exist for the N-Ni nearest-neighbour bondlength for NO adsorbed on NiO(1 0 0). Combined with the published measurements of the desorption energies, which also exceed the calculated bonding energies, these results indicate a significant failure of current theoretical treatments to provide an effective description of molecular adsorbate bonding on NiO(1 0 0).