English
 
User Manual Privacy Policy Disclaimer Contact us
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Experimental evidence for the pressure dependence of fission track annealing in apatite

MPS-Authors
There are no MPG-Authors available
External Ressource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Wendt, A. S., Vidal, O., & Chadderton, L. T. (2002). Experimental evidence for the pressure dependence of fission track annealing in apatite. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 201(3-4), 593-607.


Cite as: http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0011-82C9-C
Abstract
Fission track analysis has seen a major expansion in application to general geological problems reflecting its advances in understanding the temperature dependence of track annealing and track length distributions. However, considerable uncertainties still persist, in particular concerning the stability of fission tracks subjected to the interaction of environmental physical parameters (e.g. pressure, temperature, stress) and in extrapolation of laboratory data to geological time scales. In this work, we studied the fading behavior of spontaneous fission tracks in basic apatite [hexagonal Ca- 5(PO4)(3)(OH, F, Cl)] when exposed simultaneously to laboratory pressures, temperatures and stress over varying time spans. The experiments showed that track fading is a complex recovery mechanism, which is extremely sensitive to the coupling of these three parameters. In particular, a strong decrease in the fission track fading rate was observed as a function of increasing pressure. And a nearly temperature-independent dramatic increase in fission track recovery was observed as a function of stress. Consequently, (1) the stability field of fission tracks in apatite increases towards temperatures higher than 110degreesC depending on the absolute pressure; (2) closure ages in apatite are underestimated (> 100% for an ideal geothermobarometric gradient); (3) related exhumation and erosion rates are overestimated above the closure temperature and underestimated below the closure temperature; and (4) since the widely applied statistical description of thermally induced fading kinetics does not account for the influences of either pressure or stress and is based on fission track annealing data produced at ambient pressure, the accuracy in extrapolating fission track data to geological time scales and in their application to dynamical systems must be cast into doubt. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.