English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
Add to Basket
  Local TagsRelease HistoryDetailsSummary

Released
Journal Article

Reply to "Comment on `Appearance and disappearance of the second Born effects in the (e,3e) reaction on He' "

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons30419

Dorn,  A.
Division Prof. Dr. Joachim H. Ullrich, MPI for Nuclear Physics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons30669

Kheifets,  A.
Division Prof. Dr. Joachim H. Ullrich, MPI for Nuclear Physics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons31014

Schröter,  C. D.
Division Prof. Dr. Joachim H. Ullrich, MPI for Nuclear Physics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons30610

Höhr,  C.
Division Prof. Dr. Joachim H. Ullrich, MPI for Nuclear Physics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons30969

Sakhelashvili,  G.
Division Prof. Dr. Werner Hofmann, MPI for Nuclear Physics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons30822

Moshammer,  R.
Division Prof. Dr. Joachim H. Ullrich, MPI for Nuclear Physics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons31125

Ullrich,  J.
Division Prof. Dr. Joachim H. Ullrich, MPI for Nuclear Physics, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)

pra_dorn.pdf
(Preprint), 329KB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Dorn, A., Kheifets, A., Schröter, C. D., Höhr, C., Sakhelashvili, G., Moshammer, R., et al. (2005). Reply to "Comment on `Appearance and disappearance of the second Born effects in the (e,3e) reaction on He' ". Physical Review A, 71: 026702, pp. 1-3. Retrieved from http://link.aps.org/abstract/PRA/v71/e026702.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0011-8976-C
Abstract
In this Reply, we demonstrate that at large momentum transfer (|q| = 2 a.u.), within the experimentally accessible angular range of the ionized electrons, there is good agreement between experiment and the first Born calculation concerning the shape of the cross section. Furthermore, we show that the fact that our results for (e,3e) double ionization seemingly "contradict well-accepted results in (e,2e) single ionization" can be traced to a second Born process in which the projectile interacts with both target electrons in sequence. This process competes effectively with other double ionization mechanisms but is relatively unimportant for single ionization.