English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Continuous-flow isotope analysis of the deuterium/ hydrogen ratio in atmospheric hydrogen

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons30949

Röckmann,  Thomas
Prof. Konrad Mauersberger, Emeriti, MPI for Nuclear Physics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons30338

Brenninkmeijer,  Carl A. M.
Frank Arnold - Atmospheric Trace Gases and Ions, Research Groups, MPI for Nuclear Physics, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Rhee, T. S., Mak, J., Röckmann, T., & Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M. (2004). Continuous-flow isotope analysis of the deuterium/ hydrogen ratio in atmospheric hydrogen. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, 18, 299-306.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0011-8CC5-F
Abstract
A convenient method is described for analyzing the deuterium/hydrogen (D/H) ratio of atmospheric molecular hydrogen (H2) based on mass spectrometric isotope-ratio monitoring. The method requires small amounts of air ( 300mL STP), is operated on-line, and comprises four steps: (1) the condensation of the air matrix at 40 K; (2) the collection of the non-condensed components of the air sample (H2, Ne, He, and traces of N2) in a 5A° molecular sieves pre-concentration trap at 63 K; (3) gas chromatographic purification of H2 in a flow of He; and (4) quantification of the D/H ratio in an isotope-ratio mass spectrometer. The precision of the determination of the D/H ratio is better than 2%, which is comparable to, or better than, that obtained by conventional duel-inlet off-line analysis. There are, however, discrepancies relative to the D/H ratios determined by conventional duel-inlet analysis. This is due to differences in peak shape between reference and sample air, depending on the amount of H2 injected. Consequently, calibration runs are required. After the calibration of the system, we obtained an accuracy of 1.5%, so that the accumulated uncertainty is estimated to be less than 4%. The method also allows determination of the H2 concentration, with an uncertainty estimated to be 2%.