English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Talk

Neurophysiological investigation of experience-based processing of phoneme substitutions in L2

MPS-Authors

Van Rees Vellinga,  Merel
Language Production Group, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons72

Hanulikova,  Adriana
Adaptive Listening, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons1069

Weber,  Andrea
Adaptive Listening, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Van Rees Vellinga, M., Hanulikova, A., Zwitserlood, P., & Weber, A. (2009). Neurophysiological investigation of experience-based processing of phoneme substitutions in L2. Talk presented at 12th NVP Winter Conference on Cognition, Brain, and Behaviour. Egmond aan Zee, the Netherlands. 2009-12-18 - 2009-12-19.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0013-3A51-4
Abstract
Th-substitutions by Dutch learners of English are studied to find out whether the frequency of a substitute in Dutch-accented English infl uences the perception of phoneme substitutions. This study investigates whether early processing of the preferred substitute [t] over [s] for Dutch listeners can be made visible in a mismatch negativity-paradigm (MMN). The English pseudowords [θond], [tond] and [sond] were presented to the listener while event-related potential (ERP) data were collected. If experience indeed influences the MMN, larger amplitudes are expected for [s]. On the other hand, if only acoustic similarity influences the MMN, larger amplitudes are expected for [t]. Analyses revealed significant deviance interaction for the oddball block, with [t] eliciting larger MMN amplitudes and shorter latencies than [s]. This favours an acoustic-similarity based account; however, upcoming results from an adapted version of the study and of the German listener group may reveal whether this provides the most probable interpretation.