When two newly-acquired words are one: New words differing in stress alone are 
not automatically represented differently

Sulpizio, Simone; McQueen, James M.

アイテム詳細

登録内容を編集ファイル形式で保存

一時保存へ追加

タグ情報を表示リリース履歴を表示詳細要約

公開

会議論文

When two newly-acquired words are one: New words differing in stress alone are not automatically represented differently

MPS-Authors

/persons/resource/persons122

McQueen, James M.
Language Comprehension Department, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society;
Centre for Cognition, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands ;
Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, External Organizations;

External Resource

There are no locators available

Fulltext (restricted access)

There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.

フルテキスト (公開)

Sulpizio_2011_Interspeech_When two newly-acquired words are one.pdf
(出版社版), 148KB

付随資料 (公開)

There is no public supplementary material available

引用

Sulpizio, S., & McQueen, J. M. (2011). When two newly-acquired words are one: New words differing in stress alone are not automatically represented differently. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association (Interspeech 2011), Florence, Italy (pp. 1385-1388).

引用: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0011-F256-5

要旨

Do listeners use lexical stress at an early stage in word learning? Artificial-lexicon studies have shown that listeners can learn new spoken words easily. These studies used non-words differing in consonants and/or vowels, but not differing only in stress. If listeners use stress information in word learning, they should be able to learn new words that differ only in stress (e.g., BInulo-biNUlo). We investigated this issue here. When learning new words, Italian listeners relied on segmental information; they did not take stress information into account. Newly-acquired words differing in stress alone are not automatically represented as different words.