Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse




Journal Article

Integrating land market feedbacks into conservation planning: A mathematical programming approach


Jantke,  Kerstin
IMPRS on Earth System Modelling, MPI for Meteorology, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available

Jantke, K., & Schneider, U. A. (2011). Integrating land market feedbacks into conservation planning: A mathematical programming approach. Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 16, 227-238. doi:10.1007/s10666-010-9242-2.

Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0011-F544-8
Nature reserves are often designated ad hoc. Despite increasing conservation efforts, loss of biodiversity is still accelerating. Considering land scarcity and demand for alternative uses, efficiency in conservation strongly correlates with efficiency in land allocation. Systematic conservation planning can effectively prioritize conservation activities. Previous studies minimize opportunity costs for given conservation targets. However, these studies assume constant marginal costs of habitat protection. We extend this cost minimization approach by also considering a dynamic representation of marginal costs. The more land is allocated to nature reserves, the higher are opportunity costs, i.e., costs of forgone agricultural production. This increase in costs results from changes in the prices of agricultural commodities. We employ a deterministic, spatially explicit mathematical optimization model to allocate species habitats by minimizing opportunity costs for setting aside land for conservation purposes. The model is designed as a mixed integer programming problem and solved with GAMS/CPLEX. Our results show the need for integrating land market feedbacks into conservation planning. We find that ignoring land rent adjustments can lead to highly cost-ineffective solutions in reserve selection. © 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.