English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
Add to Basket
  Local TagsRelease HistoryDetailsSummary

Released
Conference Paper

Non-automaticity of use of orthographic knowledge in phoneme evaluation

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons30

Cutler,  Anne
Language Comprehension Group, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society;
MARCS Auditory Laboratories, University of Western Sydney, Australia;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)

Cutler_2009_non.pdf
(Publisher version), 334KB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Cutler, A., Davis, C., & Kim, J. (2009). Non-automaticity of use of orthographic knowledge in phoneme evaluation. In Proceedings of the 10th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association (Interspeech 2009) (pp. 380-383). Causal Productions Pty Ltd.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0013-3BDA-A
Abstract
Two phoneme goodness rating experiments addressed the role of orthographic knowledge in the evaluation of speech sounds. Ratings for the best tokens of /s/ were higher in words spelled with S (e.g., bless) than in words where /s/ was spelled with C (e.g., voice). This difference did not appear for analogous nonwords for which every lexical neighbour had either S or C spelling (pless, floice). Models of phonemic processing incorporating obligatory influence of lexical information in phonemic processing cannot explain this dissociation; the data are consistent with models in which phonemic decisions are not subject to necessary top-down lexical influence.