Completing the Single Market in Financial Services: The Politics of Competing 
Advocacy Coalitions

Quaglia, Lucia

doi:10.1080/13501763.2010.499239

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Add to Basket

Local TagsRelease HistoryDetailsSummary

Released

Journal Article

Completing the Single Market in Financial Services: The Politics of Competing Advocacy Coalitions

MPS-Authors

/persons/resource/persons41273

Quaglia, Lucia
Projekte von Gastwissenschaftlern und Postdoc-Stipendiaten, MPI for the Study of Societies, Max Planck Society;
Sussex European Institute, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK;

External Resource

http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2010.499239
(Publisher version)

Fulltext (restricted access)

There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.

Fulltext (public)

There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe

Supplementary Material (public)

There is no public supplementary material available

Citation

Quaglia, L. (2010). Completing the Single Market in Financial Services: The Politics of Competing Advocacy Coalitions. Journal of European Public Policy, 17(7), 1007-1023. doi:10.1080/13501763.2010.499239.

Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0012-42BA-C

Abstract

Why has the completion of the single market in financial services proved so difficult and time consuming? This paper addresses this question by evaluating the explanatory power of a revised version of the 'advocacy coalition framework' against the empirical record of the policy-making processes of key pieces of legislation dealing with securities trading in the EU. The findings suggest that in almost all the Lamfalussy directives, the main (but, by no means, the only) line of division was between a 'market-making' coalition and a 'market-shaping' one. This was owing to differences in the national regulatory frameworks, the configuration of national financial systems and their competitiveness (hence, 'interests'). However, the tension was also a consequence of different belief systems (hence, 'ideas') about financial services regulation. The latter have undergone a significant reappraisal as a result of the global financial crisis.