日本語
 
Help Privacy Policy ポリシー/免責事項
  詳細検索ブラウズ

アイテム詳細


公開

学術論文

Government Status and Legislative Behaviour: Partisan Veto Players in Australia, Denmark, Finland and Germany

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons41179

Ganghof,  Steffen
Politik und politische Ökonomie, MPI for the Study of Societies, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
フルテキスト (公開)

PP_12_2006_Ganghof.pdf
(全文テキスト(全般)), 335KB

付随資料 (公開)
There is no public supplementary material available
引用

Ganghof, S., & Bräuninger, T. (2006). Government Status and Legislative Behaviour: Partisan Veto Players in Australia, Denmark, Finland and Germany. Party Politics, 12(4), 521-539. doi:10.1177/1354068806064732.


引用: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0012-4C5A-1
要旨
In parliamentary systems, parties compete for votes and offices in the electoral arena, but in many systems they also cooperate in the legislative arena. This article examines the question of how the government status of parties affects their legislative behaviour. We develop a simple spatial model that includes parties’ positional goals (vote, office, etc.) to formalize the notion of accommodating legislative behaviour. The model implies that government parties are most accommodating while
opposition parties are least accommodating. The hypothesis is evaluated by comparing two pairs of similar political systems: Danish and Finnish coalition governments, as well as German and Australian bicameralism. The case studies support the main hypothesis that government status systematically affects parties’ level of accommodation.
We discuss the implications for two seminal approaches in
comparative institutional analysis advanced by Lijphart (1999b) and Tsebelis (2002).