日本語
 
Help Privacy Policy ポリシー/免責事項
  詳細検索ブラウズ

アイテム詳細


公開

学術論文

Overview of Industrial Relations in Romania

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons41314

Trif,  Aurora
Projekte von Gastwissenschaftlern und Postdoc-Stipendiaten, MPI for the Study of Societies, Max Planck Society;
Business, Computing and Information Management Department, London South Bank University, UK;

Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
フルテキスト (公開)

SEER_7_2004_Trif.pdf
(全文テキスト(全般)), 197KB

付随資料 (公開)
There is no public supplementary material available
引用

Trif, A. (2004). Overview of Industrial Relations in Romania. South-East Europe Review for Labour and Social Affairs, 7(2), 43-64.


引用: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0012-5067-4
要旨
This article presents an overview of the main IR institutions, concerning both the legal framework as well as their operation in practice, in Romania. It examines the role of the state, employers associations, trade unions and collective bargaining from a historical perspective. In the final part, the changes that have occurred after 1989 in these selected parameters are discussed in the broader eastern European context.
The study is based on primary data collected in 2000 and 2001 which aimed to identify what has changed since 1989 regarding the IR actors (i.e. state, employers associations and trade unions) and the relations between them. Seven officials from national institutions were interviewed: a government representative involved in the establishing of the Labour Code; two officials from employers associations; two trade union officials; the secretary of the Economic and Social Council; and the representative in Romania of the International Labour Organisation (ILO). An ILO official responsible for the activities of employers associations throughout central and eastern European countries was also interviewed. In addition, 25 (one-to-one) interviews were conducted in a total of fifteen companies which were studied during the research. Thirteen interviewees were managers or employers (three employers, three top managers, three human resource managers and four line managers), while twelve were employees (four shop stewards, seven employees and an unemployed person). Hence, data triangulation is used to ensure the reliability of the empirical evidence.