Deutsch
 
Hilfe Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT

Freigegeben

Zeitschriftenartikel

Refutational Theorem Proving for Hierarchic First-Order Theories

MPG-Autoren
/persons/resource/persons44055

Bachmair,  Leo
Programming Logics, MPI for Informatics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons44474

Ganzinger,  Harald
Programming Logics, MPI for Informatics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons45689

Waldmann,  Uwe       
Automation of Logic, MPI for Informatics, Max Planck Society;
Programming Logics, MPI for Informatics, Max Planck Society;

Externe Ressourcen

https://rdcu.be/dttWV
(Verlagsversion)

Volltexte (beschränkter Zugriff)
Für Ihren IP-Bereich sind aktuell keine Volltexte freigegeben.
Volltexte (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Volltexte in PuRe verfügbar
Ergänzendes Material (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Ergänzenden Materialien verfügbar
Zitation

Bachmair, L., Ganzinger, H., & Waldmann, U. (1994). Refutational Theorem Proving for Hierarchic First-Order Theories. Applicable Algebra in Engineering, Communication and Computing (AAECC), 5(3/4), 193-212. doi:10.1007/BF01190829.


Zitierlink: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0014-AD9C-E
Zusammenfassung
We extend previous results on theorem proving for first-order clauses with
equality to hierarchic first-order theories. Semantically such theories are
confined to conservative extensions of the base models. It is shown that
superposition together with variable abstraction and constraint refutation is
refutationally complete for theories that are sufficiently complete with
respect to simple instances. For the proof we introduce a concept of
approximation between theorem proving systems, which makes it possible to
reduce the problem to the known case of (flat) first-order theories. These
results allow the modular combination of a superposition-based theorem prover
with an arbitrary refutational prover for the primitive base theory, whose
axiomatic representation in some logic may remain hidden. Furthermore they can
be used to eliminate existentially quantified predicate symbols from certain
second-order formulae.