English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

K(E9) from K(E10)

MPS-Authors

Kleinschmidt,  Axel
Quantum Gravity & Unified Theories, AEI-Golm, MPI for Gravitational Physics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons20713

Nicolai,  Hermann
Quantum Gravity & Unified Theories, AEI-Golm, MPI for Gravitational Physics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons20714

Palmkvist,  Jakob
Quantum Gravity & Unified Theories, AEI-Golm, MPI for Gravitational Physics, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)

0611314v3.pdf
(Preprint), 381KB

jhep062007051.pdf
(Publisher version), 371KB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Kleinschmidt, A., Nicolai, H., & Palmkvist, J. (2007). K(E9) from K(E10). Journal of High Energy Physics, 2007(6): 051. doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/06/051.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0013-48DC-0
Abstract
We analyse the M-theoretic generalisation of the tangent space structure group after reduction of the D=11 supergravity theory to two space-time dimensions in the context of hidden Kac-Moody symmetries. The action of the resulting infinite-dimensional `R symmetry' group K(E9) on certain unfaithful, finite-dimensional spinor representations inherited from K(E10) is studied. We explain in detail how these representations are related to certain finite codimension ideals within K(E9), which we exhibit explicitly, and how the known, as well as new finite-dimensional `generalised holonomy groups' arise as quotients of K(E9) by these ideals. In terms of the loop algebra realisations of E9 and K(E9) on the fields of maximal supergravity in two space-time dimensions, these quotients are shown to correspond to (generalised) evaluation maps, in agreement with previous results of Nicolai and Samtleben (hep-th/0407055). The outstanding question is now whether the related unfaithful representations of K(E10) can be understood in a similar way.