日本語
 
Help Privacy Policy ポリシー/免責事項
  詳細検索ブラウズ

アイテム詳細


公開

学術論文

Exploratory behaviour in shrews: fast-lived Sorex versus slow-lived Crocidura

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons61110

von Merten,  Sophie
Department Evolutionary Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
There are no locators available
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
フルテキスト (公開)

Von Merten_2012.pdf
(出版社版), 791KB

付随資料 (公開)
There is no public supplementary material available
引用

von Merten, S., & Siemers, B. M. (2012). Exploratory behaviour in shrews: fast-lived Sorex versus slow-lived Crocidura. Animal Behaviour, 84(1), 29-38. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.04.002.


引用: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-000F-D2F1-E
要旨
Exploration of the environment is a key behaviour in animals. The exploratory behaviour of species or
populations depends on different aspects of their ecology. New evidence suggests that differences in
exploratory behaviour might also be related to life history strategies, with fast-lived animals (high
metabolic rate, short life span) being faster explorers than slow-lived ones. We tested this assumption in
shrews. Shrews are divided into two phylogenetic groups, which differ tremendously in life history.
We compared the exploratory behaviour of three species, covering both phylogenetic groups. Shrews of
the fast-lived genus Sorex were quicker to start exploration and to locate the first food patch. They also
moved faster than the slow-lived genus Crocidura. Unlike many studies on exploratory behaviour that
analyse only a short period of time (i.e. a single exploration bout with a fixed duration), we analysed the
species-specific allocation of prolonged total exploration time into exploration bouts. Using this method,
we could show that Sorex performed more, but shorter exploration bouts than Crocidura. Our results
support the hypothesis of exploratory behaviour being related to life history. While the species we tested
occur sympatrically, the two genera differ strongly in the climatic zones they inhabit. It is likely that also
during evolution they faced different types of habitat and thus different selection pressures. These
differences in evolutionary histories possibly favoured the evolution of their diversified life histories and
exploration strategies.