Deutsch
 
Hilfe Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT

Freigegeben

Zeitschriftenartikel

Traveled distances: New insights into the role of optic flow

MPG-Autoren
/persons/resource/persons84281

Vidal,  M
Department Human Perception, Cognition and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

Volltexte (beschränkter Zugriff)
Für Ihren IP-Bereich sind aktuell keine Volltexte freigegeben.
Volltexte (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Volltexte in PuRe verfügbar
Ergänzendes Material (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Ergänzenden Materialien verfügbar
Zitation

Mossio, M., Vidal, M., & Berthoz, A. (2008). Traveled distances: New insights into the role of optic flow. Vision Research, 48(2), 289-303. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2007.11.015.


Zitierlink: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0013-CAAF-B
Zusammenfassung
In this study, we addressed four related issues concerning the estimation of traveled distances in a distance-matching visual task, using a virtual reality (VR) setup. Firstly, we found that when explicit counting strategies were blocked by an interfering dual task, the performance of 35 of subjects was strongly impaired. Secondly, we found that, when encoding and test phases took place in similar perceptual contexts, subjects’ performance could be extremely accurate, which suggests that the inaccuracy and variability reported in previous studies could stem from the use of inefficient mechanisms to building context-independent representations. Thirdly, by systematically manipulating the visual cues available, we ascertained that depth cues and texture regularity were not necessary to estimate traveled distances accurately. Fourthly, we evidenced two distinct groups of subjects according to their dependence on the invariance of speed. While performance remained accurate in some subjects when we manipulated the speed of the test phase it was severely impaired in other subjects, whose strategy seemed to rely on an implicit, time-based estimation. We suggest that the existence of these different groups could account for the inaccuracy and variability observed in previous studies.