How to link the specificity of cerebellar anatomy to motor learning?

Sultan, F; Heck, D; Bekkering, H

doi:10.1017/S0140525X00081863

アイテム詳細

登録内容を編集ファイル形式で保存

一時保存へ追加

タグ情報を表示リリース履歴を表示詳細要約

公開

学術論文

How to link the specificity of cerebellar anatomy to motor learning?

MPS-Authors

/persons/resource/persons241998

Heck, D
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;
Former Department Structure and Function of Natural Nerve-Net , Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

External Resource

https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences/article/how-to-link-the-specificity-of-cerebellar-anatomy-to-motor-learning/E06C1C9A7B485DE4F40FC023FDCBD482
(出版社版)

Fulltext (restricted access)

There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.

フルテキスト (公開)

公開されているフルテキストはありません

付随資料 (公開)

There is no public supplementary material available

引用

Sultan, F., Heck, D., & Bekkering, H. (1996). How to link the specificity of cerebellar anatomy to motor learning? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 19(Special Issue 3), 474. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00081863.

引用: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0013-EBF0-4

要旨

The target article by Thach outlines the Brindley-Marr-Albus-Gilbert (BMAG) learning theory and extends its validity to cognitive processes. We
provide here an alternative explanation for the positron emission tomography (PET) data cited by Thach in support of the BMAG model. We also comment on the
anatomical and physiological basis of the BMAG model and Houk's adjustable pattern generator (APG), both models being based on similar assumptions.