How Good are Detection Proposals, really?

Hosang, Jan; Benenson, Rodrigo; Schiele, Bernt

アイテム詳細

登録内容を編集ファイル形式で保存

一時保存へ追加

タグ情報を表示リリース履歴を表示詳細要約

公開

会議論文

How Good are Detection Proposals, really?

MPS-Authors

/persons/resource/persons86681

Hosang, Jan
Computer Vision and Multimodal Computing, MPI for Informatics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons79212

Benenson, Rodrigo
Computer Vision and Multimodal Computing, MPI for Informatics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons45383

Schiele, Bernt
Computer Vision and Multimodal Computing, MPI for Informatics, Max Planck Society;

External Resource

There are no locators available

Fulltext (restricted access)

There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.

フルテキスト (公開)

paper082.pdf
(全文テキスト（全般）), 2MB

付随資料 (公開)

sup082.zip
(付録資料), 3MB

引用

Hosang, J., Benenson, R., & Schiele, B. (2014). How Good are Detection Proposals, really? In M., Valstar, A., French, & T., Pridmore (Eds.), Proceedings of the British Machine Vision Conference (pp. 1-12). Durham: BMVA Press.

引用: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0024-3C2E-2

要旨

Current top performing Pascal VOC object detectors employ detection proposals to guide the search for objects thereby avoiding exhaustive sliding window search across images. Despite the popularity of detection proposals, it is unclear which trade‐offs are made when using them during object detection. We provide an in depth analysis of ten object proposal methods along with four baselines regarding ground truth annotation recall (on Pascal VOC 2007 and ImageNet 2013), repeatability, and impact on DPM detector performance. Our findings show common weaknesses of existing methods, and provide insights to choose the most adequate method for different settings.