Deutsch
 
Hilfe Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT

Freigegeben

Zeitschriftenartikel

A global method for calculating plant CSR ecological strategies applied across biomes world-wide

MPG-Autoren
/persons/resource/persons62433

Kattge,  Jens
Interdepartmental Max Planck Fellow Group Functional Biogeography, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Max Planck Society;

Externe Ressourcen
Volltexte (beschränkter Zugriff)
Für Ihren IP-Bereich sind aktuell keine Volltexte freigegeben.
Volltexte (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Volltexte in PuRe verfügbar
Ergänzendes Material (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Ergänzenden Materialien verfügbar
Zitation

Pierce, s., Negreiros, D., Cerabolini, B. E., Kattge, J., Díaz, S., Kleyer, M., et al. (2017). A global method for calculating plant CSR ecological strategies applied across biomes world-wide. Functional Ecology, 31(2), 444-457. doi:10.1111/1365-2435.12722.


Zitierlink: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-002B-1B46-6
Zusammenfassung
1. Competitor, stress-tolerator, ruderal (CSR) theory is a prominent plant functional strategy
scheme previously applied to local floras. Globally, the wide geographic and phylogenetic coverage of available values of leaf area (LA), leaf dry matter content (LDMC) and specific
leaf area (SLA) (representing, respectively, interspecific variation in plant size and conservative
vs. acquisitive resource economics) promises the general application of CSR strategies across
biomes, including the tropical forests hosting a large proportion of Earth’s diversity.
2. We used trait variation for 3068 tracheophytes (representing 198 families, six continents and
14 biomes) to create a globally calibrated CSR strategy calculator tool and investigate strategy–
environment relationships across biomes world-wide.
3. Due to disparity in trait availability globally, co-inertia analysis was used to check correspondence
between a ‘wide geographic coverage, few traits’ data set and a ‘restricted coverage,
many traits’ subset of 371 species for which 14 whole-plant, flowering, seed and leaf traits (including
leaf nitrogen content) were available. CSR strategy/environment relationships within
biomes were investigated using fourth-corner and RLQ analyses to determine strategy/climate
specializations.
4. Strong, significant concordance (RV = 0597; P < 00001) was evident between the 14
trait multivariate space and when only LA, LDMC and SLA were used.
5. Biomes such as tropical moist broadleaf forests exhibited strategy convergence (i.e. clustered
around a CS/CSR median; C:S:R = 43:42:15%), with CS-selection associated with warm,
stable situations (lesser temperature seasonality), with greater annual precipitation and potential
evapotranspiration. Other biomes were characterized by strategy divergence: for example,
deserts varied between xeromorphic perennials such as Larrea divaricata, classified as
S-selected (C:S:R = 1:99:0%) and broadly R-selected annual herbs (e.g. Claytonia perfoliata;
R/CR-selected; C:S:R = 21:0:79%). Strategy convergence was evident for several growth
habits (e.g. trees) but not others (forbs).
6. The CSR strategies of vascular plants can now be compared quantitatively within and
between biomes at the global scale. Through known linkages between underlying leaf traits
and growth rates, herbivory and decomposition rates, this method and the strategy–environment
relationships it elucidates will help to predict which kinds of species may assemble in
response to changes in biogeochemical cycles, climate and land use.