English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Forests of opportunities and mischief: disentangling the interactions between forests, parasites and immune responses

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons62427

Kaiser,  Sonja
Emeritus Group, Prof. E.-D. Schulze, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Renner, S. C., Lüdtke, B., Kaiser, S., Kienle, J., Schaefer, H. M., Segelbacher, G., et al. (2016). Forests of opportunities and mischief: disentangling the interactions between forests, parasites and immune responses. International Journal for Parasitology, 46(9), 571-579. doi:10.1016/j.ijpara.2016.04.008.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-002B-8129-6
Abstract
Habitat characteristics determine the presence of individuals through resource availability, but at the
same time, such features also influence the occurrence of parasites. We analyzed how birds respond to
changes in interior forest structures, to forest management regimes, and to the risk of haemosporidian
infections. We captured and took blood samples from blackcaps (Sylvia atricapilla) and chaffinches
(Fringilla coelebs) in three different forest types (beech, mixed deciduous, spruce). We measured birds’
body asymmetries, detected avian haemosporidians, and counted white blood cells as an immune measure
of each individual per forest type. We used, to our knowledge for the first time, continuous forest
structural parameters to quantify habitat structure, and found significant effects of habitat structure
on parasite prevalence that previously have been undetected. We found three times higher prevalence
for blackcaps compared with chaffinches. Parasite intensity varied significantly within host species
depending on forest type, being lowest in beech forests for both host species. Structurally complex habitats
with a high degree of entropy had a positive effect on the likelihood of acquiring an infection, but the
effect on prevalence was negative for forest sections with a south facing aspect. For blackcaps, forest gaps
also had a positive effect on prevalence, but canopy height had a negative one. Our results suggest that
forest types and variations in forest structure influence the likelihood of acquiring an infection, which
subsequently has an influence on host health status and body condition; however, responses to some environmental factors are host-specific.