Deutsch
 
Hilfe Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT
Zur Ablage hinzufügen
  Lokale TagsFreigabegeschichteDetailsÜbersicht

Freigegeben
Beitrag in Sammelwerk

Romania: Europeanisation of Good Governance: Where and Why Does It Fail, and What Can Be Done About It?

MPG-Autoren
/persons/resource/persons199539

Mendelski,  Martin
Politische Ökonomie der europäischen Integration, MPI for the Study of Societies, Max Planck Society;

Externe Ressourcen
Es sind keine externen Ressourcen hinterlegt
Volltexte (beschränkter Zugriff)
Für Ihren IP-Bereich sind aktuell keine Volltexte freigegeben.
Volltexte (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Volltexte in PuRe verfügbar
Ergänzendes Material (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Ergänzenden Materialien verfügbar
Zitation

Mendelski, M. (2017). Romania: Europeanisation of Good Governance: Where and Why Does It Fail, and What Can Be Done About It? In A. Mungiu-Pippidi, & J. Warkotsch (Eds.), Beyond the Panama Papers: The Performance of EU Good Governance Promotion (pp. 68-78). Opladen: Barbara Budrich Publishers.


Zitierlink: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-002E-321C-B
Zusammenfassung
What impact does the European Union (EU) have on the development of good governance in
Romania? Does EU conditionality facilitate or hinder the transition towards good governance?
This brief policy-oriented chapter argues that the EU’s promotion of good governance in Romania
leads to some selective progress but, overall, to the persistence of bad governance. In
particular, the paper shows that Romania’s process of Europeanisation has resulted in 1. some
progress across three dimensions of governance (substantive legality, capacity and efficiency/effectiveness)
but 2. regress in three others (formal legality, impartiality and coherence). In other
words, reforms generate more substantive laws that are adapted to international/European
standards (best practices), but at the same time the new laws become instable, incoherent (contradictory),
hardly enforced and less general. In addition, reforms improve capacity (inputs)
and partly efficiency (outputs) or effectiveness (outcomes) but undermine the procedural and
structural aspects of government quality (impartiality, coherence), for instance through increased
politicisation and fragmentation of the state structures. Overall, the analysis suggests
that there is no transition towards good governance in Romania, despite selective progress.