English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
Add to Basket
  DetailsSummary

Released
Journal Article

Authors’ Response: Negative emotions in art reception: Refining theoretical assumptions and adding variables to the Distancing-Embracing model

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons130297

Menninghaus,  Winfried
Department of Language and Literature, Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons130456

Wagner,  Valentin
Department of Language and Literature, Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons130458

Wassiliwizky,  Eugen
Department of Language and Literature, Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Menninghaus, W., Wagner, V., Hanich, J., Wassiliwizky, E., Jacobsen, T., & Koelsch, S. (2017). Authors’ Response: Negative emotions in art reception: Refining theoretical assumptions and adding variables to the Distancing-Embracing model. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40: e380, pp. 44-63. doi:10.1017/S0140525X17001947.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-002E-88D7-B
Abstract
Abstract: While covering all commentaries, our response
specifically focuses on the following issues: How can the
hypothesis of emotional distancing (qua art framing) be
compatible with stipulating high levels of felt negative emotions
in art reception? Which concept of altogether pleasurable mixed
emotions does our model involve? Can mechanisms of
predictive coding, social sharing, and immersion enhance the
power of our model?