Deutsch
 
Hilfe Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT

Freigegeben

Zeitschriftenartikel

International Accounting Standards in Africa: Selective Recursivity for the "Happy Few"?

MPG-Autoren
/persons/resource/persons41272

Quack,  Sigrid
Assoziierte Wissenschaftlerinnen und Wissenschaftler, MPI for the Study of Societies, Max Planck Society;
Institut für Soziologie, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Germany;

/persons/resource/persons179584

Zori,  Solomon George
International Max Planck Research School on the Social and Political Constitution of the Economy, MPI for the Study of Societies, Max Planck Society;
Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands;

Externe Ressourcen
Volltexte (beschränkter Zugriff)
Für Ihren IP-Bereich sind aktuell keine Volltexte freigegeben.
Volltexte (frei zugänglich)

GP_8_2017_Quack.pdf
(beliebiger Volltext), 576KB

Ergänzendes Material (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Ergänzenden Materialien verfügbar
Zitation

Botzem, S., Quack, S., & Zori, S. G. (2017). International Accounting Standards in Africa: Selective Recursivity for the "Happy Few"? Global Policy, 8(4), 553-562. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.12514.


Zitierlink: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0000-E695-4
Zusammenfassung
This study explores recursivity in international accounting standard‐setting, focusing on participation of actors from African countries. While the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) Foundation bases its legitimacy claims as a global standard‐setter on a combination of expertise and a formally transparent set of recursive procedures for consultation of stakeholders, empirical results show that participation in the latter is geographically very uneven. The article argues that conceptual mismatch between the standard‐setter's objectives on the one hand and the socio‐economic, cultural and political conditions in many African countries on the other leads to selective recursivity that is problematic for the former's legitimacy and effectiveness. These findings are of wider relevance for debates on global standard‐setting and development.